AI for auditory implants

Home>
AI for auditory implants

The application of AI to improve auditory implants and fitting procedures

Real-Time Deep Neural Network to Remix Music for Cochlear Implant Users

Post Comments:0 Comments
Post published:June 8, 2020
Post Category:AI and Music / AI for auditory implants / VCCA2020 ABSTRACTS

Design and evaluation of a real-time audio source separation algorithm to remix music for cochlear implant users

Continue Reading Real-Time Deep Neural Network to Remix Music for Cochlear Implant Users

Detection of current shunts with a ladder-network model

Post Comments:0 Comments
Post published:June 4, 2020
Post Category:AI for auditory implants / Computational Models / VCCA2020 ABSTRACTS

Detection of current shunts with a ladder-network model

Continue Reading Detection of current shunts with a ladder-network model

The Panoramic ECAP Method: modelling the electrode-neuron interface in cochlear implant users

Post Comments:3 Comments
Post published:June 2, 2020
Post Category:AI for auditory implants / Computational Models / VCCA2020 ABSTRACTS

The Panoramic ECAP Method models patient-specific electrode-neuron interfaces in cochlear implant users, and may provide important information for optimizing efficacy and improving speech perception outcomes.

Continue Reading The Panoramic ECAP Method: modelling the electrode-neuron interface in cochlear implant users

Short and long-term adaptation in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve are better described by a power law

Post Comments:0 Comments
Post published:May 22, 2020
Post Category:AI for auditory implants / Computational Models / VCCA2020 ABSTRACTS

Adaptation of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation can best be described by a power law or a sum of exponents.

Continue Reading Short and long-term adaptation in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve are better described by a power law

Search for:

Fastest Updates!

Get all news to your email quick and easy.

Email is required. Email not valid.

Accept GDPR Terms This field is required

Thanks for your subscription.

Failed to subscribe, please contact admin.

May 2021
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
					1	2
3	4	5	6	7	8	9
10	11	12	13	14	15	16
17	18	19	20	21	22	23
24	25	26	27	28	29	30
31

« Apr

References

2351083 items 1 10 default desc year https://computationalaudiology.com/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/

Barbour, D. L., & Wasmann, J.-W. A. (2021). Performance and Potential of Machine Learning Audiometry. The Hearing Journal, 74(3), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000737592.24476.88

Kayser, H., Herzke, T., Maanen, P., Zimmermann, M., Grimm, G., & Hohmann, V. (2021). Open community platform for hearing aid algorithm research: open Master Hearing Aid (openMHA). ArXiv:2103.02313 [Cs, Eess]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4601604

Melgarejo-Nagata, H., & Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. (n.d.). Analysis of emerging technologies for the social inclusion of people with hearing disabilities: a review of the scientific literature from 2005-2020. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 8(03), 2021.

Melgarejo-Nagata, H., & Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. (2021). Analysis of emerging technologies for the social inclusion of people with hearing disabilities: a review of the scientific literature from 2005 - 2020. Clinical Medicine, 08(03), 14.

Zhang, Q., Wang, D., Zhao, R., & Yu, Y. (2021). SoundLip: Enabling Word and Sentence-level Lip Interaction for Smart Devices. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 5(1), 43:1–43:28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448087

Shekar, R. C. M. C., Belitz, C., & Hansen, J. H. L. (2021). Development of CNN-Based Cochlear Implant and Normal Hearing Sound Recognition Models Using Natural and Auralized Environmental Audio. 2021 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 728–733. https://doi.org/10.1109/SLT48900.2021.9383550

Ratnanather, J. T., Bhattacharya, R., Heston, M. B., Song, J., Fernandez, L. R., Lim, H. S., Lee, S.-W., Tam, E., Yoo, S., Bae, S.-H., Lam, I., Jeon, H. W., Chang, S. A., & Koo, J.-W. (2021). An mHealth App (Speech Banana) for Auditory Training: App Design and Development Study. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(3), e20890. https://doi.org/10.2196/20890

Sundgaard, J. V., Harte, J., Bray, P., Laugesen, S., Kamide, Y., Tanaka, C., Paulsen, R. R., & Christensen, A. N. (2021). Deep metric learning for otitis media classification. Medical Image Analysis, 102034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102034

Pitathawatchai, P., Chaichulee, S., & Kirtsreesakul, V. (2021). Robust machine learning method for imputing missing values in audiograms collected in children. International Journal of Audiology, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.1884909

Wasmann, J.-W. A., & Barbour, D. L. (2021). Emerging Hearing Assessment Technologies for Patient Care. The Hearing Journal, 74(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000737596.12888.22

Performance and Potential of Machine Learning Audiometry : The Hearing Journal. (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2021, from https://journals.lww.com/thehearingjournal/Fulltext/2021/03000/Performance_and_Potential_of_Machine_Learning.11.aspx

Hülsmeier, D., Schädler, M. R., & Kollmeier, B. (2021). DARF: A data-reduced FADE version for simulations of speech recognition thresholds with real hearing aids. Hearing Research, 404, 108217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108217

Jones, S. A., & Noppeney, U. (2021). Ageing and multisensory integration: A review of the evidence, and a computational perspective. Cortex, 138, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.001

Kim, S. (n.d.). AI-Driven Insights from AI-Driven Data - Hearing Review. Retrieved April 5, 2021, from https://www.hearingreview.com/hearing-products/hearing-aids/ai

Uhler, K., Hunter, S., & Gilley, P. M. (2021). Mismatched response predicts behavioral speech discrimination outcomes in infants with hearing loss and normal hearing. Infancy, 26(2), 327–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12386

Wimalarathna, H., Ankmnal-Veeranna, S., Allan, C., Agrawal, S. K., Allen, P., Samarabandu, J., & Ladak, H. M. (2021). Comparison of machine learning models to classify Auditory Brainstem Responses recorded from children with Auditory Processing Disorder. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 200, 105942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105942

Dotan, A., & Shriki, O. (2021). Tinnitus-like “hallucinations” elicited by sensory deprivation in an entropy maximization recurrent neural network. BioRxiv, 2021.01.11.426188. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.426188

Dotan, A., & Shriki, O. (2021). Tinnitus-like “hallucinations” elicited by sensory deprivation in an entropy maximization recurrent neural network. BioRxiv.

Wasmann, J.-W. A., & Barbour, D. L. (2021). Emerging Hearing Assessment Technologies for Patient Care. The Hearing Journal, 74(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000737596.12888.22

Barbour, D. L., & Wasmann, J.-W. A. (2021). Performance and Potential of Machine Learning Audiometry. The Hearing Journal, 74(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000737592.24476.88

Wasmann, J.-W. A., Lanting, C. P., Huinck, W. J., Mylanus, E. A. M., van der Laak, J. W. M., Govaerts, P. J., Swanepoel, D. W., Moore, D. R., & Barbour, D. L. (2021). Computational Audiology: New Approaches to Advance Hearing Health Care in the Digital Age. Ear and Hearing, Publish Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001041

Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments | SpringerLink. (n.d.). Retrieved March 14, 2021, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-017-1361-2

Woods, K. J. P., Siegel, M. H., Traer, J., & McDermott, J. H. (2017). Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7), 2064–2072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1361-2

De Sousa, K. C., Swanepoel, D. W., Moore, D. R., Myburgh, H. C., & Smits, C. (2020). Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli. Ear and Hearing, 41(2), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000775

Chesley, B., & Barbour, D. L. (2020). Visual Field Estimation by Probabilistic Classification. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 24(12), 3499–3506. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2020.2999567

Motlagh Zadeh, L., Silbert, N. H., Sternasty, K., Swanepoel, D. W., Hunter, L. L., & Moore, D. R. (2019). Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(47), 23753–23759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903315116

Saunders, G. H., Bott, A., & Tietz, L. H. (2020). Hearing care providers’ perspectives on the utility of datalogging information. American Journal of Audiology, 29(3S), 610–622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00089

Saunders Gabrielle H., Bott Anthea, & Tietz Lukas H. B. (2020). Hearing Care Providers’ Perspectives on the Utility of Datalogging Information. American Journal of Audiology, 29(3S), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00089

Schmidt, J. H., Brandt, C., Pedersen, E. R., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Andersen, T., Poulsen, T., & Bælum, J. (2014). A user-operated audiometry method based on the maximum likelihood principle and the two-alternative forced-choice paradigm. International Journal of Audiology, 53(6), 383–391.

Masalski, M., Kipiński, L., Grysiński, T., & Kręcicki, T. (2016). Hearing tests on mobile devices: evaluation of the reference sound level by means of biological calibration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(5), e130.

Masalski, M., Grysiński, T., & Kręcicki, T. (2018). Hearing tests based on biologically calibrated mobile devices: comparison with pure-tone audiometry. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 6(1), e10.

Colsman, A., Supp, G. G., Neumann, J., & Schneider, T. R. (2020). Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 744.

Yao, J., Wan, Y., & Givens, G. D. (2010). Using web services to realize remote hearing assessment. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 24(1), 41–50.

Svensson, U. P., Kvaløy, O., & Berg, T. (2015). A comparison of test–retest variability and time efficiency of auditory thresholds measured with pure tone audiometry and new early warning test. Applied Acoustics, 90, 153–159.

Corry, M., Sanders, M., & Searchfield, G. D. (2017). The accuracy and reliability of an app-based audiometer using consumer headphones: pure tone audiometry in a normal hearing group. International Journal of Audiology, 56(9), 706–710.

Margolis, R. H., Glasberg, B. R., Creeke, S., & Moore, B. C. (2010). AMTAS®: Automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: Validation studies. International Journal of Audiology, 49(3), 185–194.

Margolis, R. H., & Moore, B. C. (2011). AMTAS®: Automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. Sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps. International Journal of Audiology, 50(7), 440–447.

Margolis, R. H., Frisina, R., & Walton, J. P. (2011). AMTAS®: Automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: II. Air conduction audiograms in children and adults. International Journal of Audiology, 50(7), 434–439.

Sandström, J., Swanepoel, D., Laurent, C., Umefjord, G., & Lundberg, T. (2020). Accuracy and reliability of smartphone self-test audiometry in community clinics in low income settings: a comparative study. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 129(6), 578–584.

Bornman, M., Swanepoel, D. W., De Jager, L. B., & Eikelboom, R. H. (2019). Extended high-frequency smartphone audiometry: validity and reliability. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 30(3), 217–226.

Sandström, J., Swanepoel, D. W., Carel Myburgh, H., & Laurent, C. (2016). Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts. International Journal of Audiology, 55(4), 232–238.

Yeung, J., Javidnia, H., Heley, S., Beauregard, Y., Champagne, S., & Bromwich, M. (2013). The new age of play audiometry: prospective validation testing of an iPad-based play audiometer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 42(1), 21.

Yao, J. J., Yao, D., & Givens, G. (2015). A Browser-Server-Based Tele-audiology System That Supports Multiple Hearing Test Modalities. Telemed J E Health, 21(9), 697–704.

Whitton, J. P., Hancock, K. E., Shannon, J. M., & Polley, D. B. (2016). Validation of a Self-Administered Audiometry Application: An Equivalence Study. Laryngoscope, 126(10), 2382–2388.

van Tonder, J., Swanepoel, W., Mahomed-Asmail, F., Myburgh, H., & Eikelboom, R. H. (2017). Automated Smartphone Threshold Audiometry: Validity and Time Efficiency. J Am Acad Audiol, 28(3), 200–208.

Yeung, J. C., Heley, S., Beauregard, Y., Champagne, S., & Bromwich, M. A. (2015). Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 79(8), 1248–1252.

Vinay, Henriksen, V., Kvaloy, O., & Svensson, U. P. (2014). Development and Calibration of a New Automated Method to Measure Air Conduction Auditory Thresholds Using an Active Earplug. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 100(1), 113–117. ://WOS:000330557200013

Van Tasell, D. J., & Folkeard, P. (2013). Reliability and accuracy of a method of adjustment for self-measurement of auditory thresholds. Otol Neurotol, 34(1), 9–15.

Thoidis, I., Vrysis, L., Markou, K., & Papanikolaou, G. (2019). Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer. Int J Audiol, 58(8), 476–483.

Swanepoel de, W., Matthysen, C., Eikelboom, R. H., Clark, J. L., & Hall, J. W., 3rd. (2015). Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation. Int J Audiol, 54(11), 777–785.